October 6, 2020 | News | No Comments
The explosion of charter schools in the U.S. is allowing individuals, corporations, and organizations to use public funds to secure their own financial gain and private profit—often at the expense of the common interest they claim to serve, a new policy brief from the National Education Policy Center at the University of Colorado-Boulder finds.
Released Thursday by Rutgers Professor Bruce Baker and Western Michigan University Professor Gary Miron, the report argues that charter school policy promotes “privatization and profiteering” via the following channels, as quoted from the report:
- A substantial share of public expenditure intended for the delivery of direct educational services to children is being extracted inadvertently or intentionally for personal or business financial gain, creating substantial inefficiencies;
- Public assets are being unnecessarily transferred to private hands, at public expense, risking the future provision of ‘public’ education;
- Charter school operators are growing highly endogenous, self-serving private entities built on funds derived from lucrative management fees and rent extraction which further compromise the future provision of ‘public’ education; and
- Current disclosure requirements make it unlikely that any related legal violations, ethical concerns, or merely bad policies and practices are not realized until clever investigative reporting, whistleblowers or litigation brings them to light.
In a blog post on Thursday, education policy analyst Diane Ravitch argued “this is an important report because it lays out the specific ways in which charter operators have gamed the system for the sake of lucre.”
A report summary offers one example of charters siphoning off public funds. “[C]harter operators working through third-party corporations can use taxpayer dollars to purchase buildings and land,” the summary states. “The seller in these purchases is sometimes the public school district itself. That is, taxpayer dollars are used to purchase property from the public, and the property ends up being owned by the private corporation that operates or is affiliated with the charter school.”
“This particular type of transaction is usually legal and it can be very logical from the perspective of each of the parties involved. But we should be troubled by the public policy that allows and even encourages this to happen,” said Baker in a statement released Thursday.
Miron added that “less than arm’s-length leasing agreements and lucrative management fees are extracting resources that might otherwise be dedicated to direct services for children.”
SCROLL TO CONTINUE WITH CONTENT