'Totally Disqualifying': Demands for Kavanaugh to Withdraw After Letter Details Alleged Sexual Assault

Home / 'Totally Disqualifying': Demands for Kavanaugh to Withdraw After Letter Details Alleged Sexual Assault

As other previously “confidential” documents released this week added to “serious and concerning” evidence that Brett Kavanaugh previously committed perjury during earlier confirmation hearings in his career, new reporting out Friday provides details about the contents of a constituent letter Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) referred to the FBI about the controversial Supreme Court nominee.

In that letter, according to reporting by investigative journalists Ronan Farrow and Jane Mayer at the New Yorker, a woman accuses Kavanaugh of attempting to sexually assault her in the early 1980s when they were both high school students. From the New Yorker:

The New York Times also reported on the letter Friday, citing “three people familiar with [its] contents.”

Kavanaugh, for his part, said in a statement to the New Yorker that he “categorically and unequivocally” denies the allegation.

In response to the new reporting, Shaunna Thomas, executive director and co-founder of women’s group UltraViolet, said Kavanaugh should withdraw his nomination.


“The accusations against Brett Kavanaugh are serious, troubling, and totally disqualifying. He should withdraw his nomination immediately. Violence against women should have no place in our society, and it certainly should have no place on the highest court in the nation,” she said.

Though she refused to disclose what it contained, Feinstein confirmed existence of the letter on Thursday and said in a statement that she had referred the matter to the FBI. Initially the woman brought her concerns to both Feinsten and Rep. Anna Eshoo (D-Calif) in July after Kavanaugh’s nomination triggered the painful memory of the event.

Both the New Yorker and The Intercept reported that Feinstein had rebuffed calls for fellow Democrats on the Senate Judiciary Committee to share the letter.

In addition to concerns about possible perjury in his 2006 confirmation hearing for his seat on a federal appeals court, democratic lawmakers and advocacy groups have pushed back against Kavanaugh’s nomination given his record of siding with corporate power over public interest and his potential threat to Roe v. Wade

The Senate Judiciary Committee’s vote on Kavanaugh has been pushed back to Sept. 20; the full Senate could vote by the end of the month.

Our work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. Feel free to republish and share widely.

Click Here: st kilda saints guernsey 2019

About Author

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *